Tag Archives: video games

The Show’s been cancelled: Guitar Hero is No More

18 Mar

The Show’s Been Cancelled: Guitar Hero Is No More
by SimplyKyle 03/18/11

CANCELLEDIn early February of 2011, Activision announced that it would discontinue the Guitar Hero brand games, that includes Rock Band too. Whether or not you had heard about this, you’ve had a month to cope. So it’s only right we discuss why this is best and was foreseeable from the first game. Despite the fact that the public runs through trends quick than Charlie Sheen through hookers. (Yeah I said it, It was about time the damn show ended.)

It comes as no surprise that Guitar Hero would go the way of ColecoVision. Honestly the only thing that I feel kept it going for as long as it did was the abundance of pics you could find of the game’s avid fans……

guitar 1guitar 4
guitar 2 guitar 3
guitar 5

(how will attractive girls, with the desire to be accepted, pretend to be interested in video games now?)

Dwindling sales was attributed to the final decision as Warriors of Rock version on sold 1.3 million copies worldwide. Which downright sucks considering the 3rd game sold over 15 million. (We don’t even have to mention the less than 1 million sold by Green Day Rock band) The real reasons I believe Guitar Hero has seen its last is because everyone of the games are the same damn thing. It was getting to the point that, if bought any after the first one, you were just paying to hear the same songs over and over. Most of which have been long played out by the radio stations in the first place.

Another reason is that the people who bought the first one and didn’t like it or couldn’t figure out how to get good at it, sure as hell wouldn’t buy the next one or the 16 that followed, not including the seven versions released for mobile devices only. As more of the same gameplay continued to come out in each version people started getting bored with it faster. It wasn’t like you had some new and exciting storyline or cast of characters, so why bother buying one based on Aerosmith or Van Halen? If you really wanted to listen to the original songs you might as well buy a CD since they’re less than $10 at FYE now or do what the rest of the world does and download it illegally. You’ll save yourself having to hear the mess ups that interrupt the song because you can’t really play guitar in the first place.

Which brings me to my next point. I am glad that the Guitar Hero fad has been nixed because it had created a group of people who thought they were actual musicians because they could beat Free Bird on expert. It saddens me to see people who have a false sense of accomplishment because they believe they have a talent in a virtual, unrealistic setting.

metrostation(That means you miley cyrus’ brother, just give it up)

If even half of the kids who devoted all their time to the game put even just half of that effort into picking up an actual instrument maybe we wouldn’t have the less talented one hit wonders we now have in their places. Who knows?

You can really only ride the fame for so long. It’s even shorter when you don’t change anything except adding sell out artists (who nobody wanted to hear from since the early nineties anyway) on the cover your game.

It was a neat little game, and probably one of the most successful and recognizable add-on alternative controllers for a console.

NES-LightGun(except for this, or maybe the Sega vibrating vest)

We’ll always remember the countless hours spent with friends forming living room bands and playing to a venue of usually 5. I’m glad to see Activision make a wise decision to “break up the band” because no one wants to see something in music become unwanted and last longer than they probably should, never changing….

black eyed peas(Did anyone even read this article after the pictures of the half naked girls?)

-Photos used are property of Activison, Nintendo, A&M, Interscope, AW Music. They do not belong to GeekTheWorldOnline and are intended for use in character and media review in strictly entertainment and editorial means. Their use is protected by Section 107 under the US copyright law.

What makes a game worthwhile?

14 Jan

What makes a game worthwhile?
by Dave Lucier

Ok, so… My first post, not only here but anywhere, so stay with me, this could be a bumpy ride. Truth be told, I don’t know what I want to do with this space on a regular basis, or even if I do want to stick to only one thing, so for now it will be review/op-ed/randomness as I have stuff I want to post, and hopefully it will be entertaining/informative enough that you dear readers will like it. Please if there is anything you’d like to see me tackle/review let me know, I’d love to be able to turn this into a question and answer or reader request based article but obviously that will require some regular readers first now wont it?


To start off I’ll talk about some of the things I will be looking at when I do reviews that I don’t feel a lot of others do. The first is Replay-ability. Yes plenty of others do go over this when reviewing a game, however 99% of them just equate it with how many ways you can go thru the game, or how many times you HAVE to play through to get everything. This definitely should be in every review, however it doesn’t always equal replay-ability. To me replay-ability is how much you would WANT to play through the game again. I don’t care if there’s 2 ways through every level if by the time I’m done with the game I don’t have a desire to play it again. This to me is a huge fault while reviewing open world or “sandbox” games and even some RPG’s. Reviewers will note that there are hours upon hours of stuff to do, like collect 50 hidden beer bottles or kill every monster at least 50 times to get a insanely overpowered game-breaking weapon. Now again, I don’t have a problem with these things IN a game, I just don’t think it automatically equates to wanting to play the game again or longer, it almost never does for me. Examples of games that I would rate 10 out of 10 on replay-ability are Deus-ex, Chrono Trigger, and Devil May Cry. Now the first two probably wont surprise anyone, as they are widely regarded as two of the best games ever made, and do have multiple paths/endings. However that is not the only reason I have played them through so may times, its because they actually make each path worth taking, and enough options where its still fun no matter how you replay. Which leads into the 3rd and probably oddest choice. Devil may cry is again, widely known as a good game, and that’s because it is. Lots of fun and action and fairly easily accessible. However I have never seen it referred to as a “replayable” game. Whereas I’ve replayed it about 5 times just because of how good and how fun a game it is. As opposed to lets say GTA III which I loved, but only played through once. This is what I don’t think I’ve ever seen mentioned in a review when talking about replay-ability and I plan on doing that here.

Fun Factor

The next topic that I plan on giving front row treatment that most other reviews put as a secondary topic is fun. Just plan unexplainable fun. Now some reviewers will mention this in the text of a review, but rarely does it go beyond that, and I’ve never seen a review that actually has that as a measurement, which I currently plan on doing.

There are some games that despite all their flaws, are just fun. Now this is 2nd hand but a game I keep hearing about that I have yet to play is Earth Defense Force 2017. Basically per the reviews the game falls short on most fronts, graphics/sound/gameplay features, but is still somehow fun. This is something that needs to be in more reviews as a game can also succeed on all those fronts, but still not be fun. For me Final Fantasy 12 is the best example of that, I played for a few hrs said “well this is a solid game, seems really well done.” and haven’t played it since. I am aware that this is also highly subjective and I will do everything I can to make sure that when this comes up ill give my background, (IE: what other games like this I’ve enjoyed) and I’ll also do my best to compare it to other games as far as the fun factor goes to make sure that it’s clear what I think is fun.

So for example, “the fun factor of the game is right up there with Devil May Cry” If you, unlike me, didn’t have that “fun factor” with DMC then you probably wont feel the same about this game. Now seeing as I used the phrase fun factor 3 times in 2 sentences I think that’s probably a good indication of  what I should call the rating going forward.

Learning Curve

The final point I plan on taking care to give its due in my reviews (that wasn’t intentional I swear) is accessibility or learning curve. Again something that gets briefly mentioned in most reviews usually “the game has a decent learning curve” and that’s it. I plan on going in depth and letting you know how and why the accessibility works the way it does and again, comparing it to other games to let you judge for yourself.

Essentially this is what I always look for in reviews when I’m shopping for a game, I’ll look for at least one high score and one lower score and look to see if they actually say the same thing and then judge for myself based on that. That way if one reviewer thinks the combat system is innovative and fun, and the other says it is confusing and overly complicated but both describe the exact same combat system I have a much better idea of what I’m getting into and I hope to be able to give you that same level of detail as well on all fronts. So that’s my review style in a rather large nutshell, and hopefully soon I will have an actually review for you to enjoy.

“Ghost Trick: Phantom Detective” Game Review

10 Jan

Ghost Trick: Phantom Detective
review by Dave Lucier


Alright, well the timing on this is perfect, I start out writing for this website here and I just happen to stumble across one of the best games I’ve played in a long time. Ghost Trick: Phantom Detective. Yes it sounds a little crazy, and in truth it is, however this game was fun, innovative, original, and walks the fine line of humor/drama amazingly well.

The setup is this, you start of the game “waking up” after being killed. You are then treated to one of the better tutorial levels I’ve seen. It’s informative but at the same time it doesn’t have nearly as much of that “yes yes yes I get it lets move on” as most games do. Don’t get me wrong, it is still there, but not as much. Now this is coming from someone who loves origin stories so the fact that the tutorial is explaining how all the powers work may have something to do with my opinion on this, so your mileage may vary, but I found it enjoyable. Essentially you can “jump” from one object to another over a pre-set distance, and on occasion you can interact, or what the game calls performing a “ghost trick” on the item. So using the first level as an example, you have to get up a pile of junk, but only have a few items that you are allowed to jump into, one is a folding cot, which you jump into, and then unfold in order to get closer to the next item that you can jump into.

The other part of your abilities, and the main draw of the game for me, is that if you find a body, you can jump into it and go back to 4 min before their death. This allows you to both see what happened to them, which gives you more plot, and you are able to try and alter their fate by using your ghost tricks. The nice thing about this is although there is some trial and error, the game does have a halfway point that you can restart at instead of going back to the beginning, and throughout the game there was really one one point where I got frustrated, and that was solely because that apparently in the world of japan a bullet is shaped like this guys hat:

p1 japanese bullet instead of this:  p2 american bullet

Which, when the goal of the scene is to find something the same shape as a bullet, is quite annoying.

Probably the most important thing to know going into this is the choice of items you can jump into is very arbitrary. Basically the game says “only some objects have cores, which are what allow you to jump into them” but that is all the explanation that you get, which is fine with me but I know some people may be looking for more on that front, I advise you, don’t. Its much more fun that way.

The plot of the game is for you to find out who you were and how/why you died. A straightforward sounding trip, however this one is filled with so many twists and turns that you get a bit dizzy. These turns range from partially obvious to well crafted surprises. Many times I found my self knowing in general what the next twist would be, but not the specifics, like in a horror movie when you know the mystery killer is actually one of the kids, but you don’t know which one or why. My best advice to you is to see this one through to the end, which I found to be amazingly rewarding and well worth it. In addition to this the cast of characters is…. interesting, but in a good way, most of the main characters are somewhat normal with just some random quirks, but then you have some odd balls, such as the smooth dancing inspector and the junkyard superintendent w/the pet pigeon. All these characters, although weird, still somehow seem to fit in the story and don’t seem that out of place so it’s not as jarring as it sounds.

As far as the game play portion of that journey, it’s almost all good. You have two ways to control everything, stylus or traditional buttons and both are always active so you can mix/match, which is what I did. You have two worlds to navigate, the real world, which you can slide the screen around to get a better view with either the stylus or d-pad, and the ghost world, which stays locked on you, but is where you can see what cores are around for you to jump to, again by using the d-pad to “reach” in the direction your pushing, or drawing a line with the stylus, which is sometimes required to reach certain cores that are behind another core. In this ghost world the top screen shows a picture of the item you are in and what, if anything, you can “trick” it into doing. This may have been my favorite part, because in many puzzle/adventure games half the game is figuring out what items are useful and what ones aren’t and this tells you right away if its just a stepping stone or useful item. Now this is a type of game I do normally enjoy but end up using a walkthrough for most of it just because I’ll become impatient with the trial and error nature of the puzzles, however this game does a great job of guiding you but not hand-holding you. Now if you are a hardcore Myst fan you may have a different opinion, but for me this was the perfect middle ground of difficulty and I only resorted to a walkthrough once, for the above mentioned “lost in translation” moment.

As far as graphics and sound, they are both good. The music, although good, is limited to only 2 or 3 tracks, and as nice as they are, do get a bit repetitive after a while, whereas the sound effects just seemed to fit perfectly with the game. The graphics are colorful, and clear, on par with most recent DS offerings. I thought it was a little odd that the top screen of the DS, which from what I understand does have slightly better resolution, was only used for the item info and not for any of the few cinematic scenes in the game, but it didn’t seem to suffer for it.

Now as far as replayablity. This I’m not sure on. As much as I loved the story that was told, because so much of it is based on not knowing what was going on, it does loose some replay value there, and the game doesn’t offer anything new a 2nd time around from what I understand. But it was definitely worth a play through, and who knows I may change my mind in a year and want to play it again.

Fun factor? Through the roof. And this game is a perfect example of why I want this in my reviews. I can’t really explain how a puzzle/adventure game is this much fun. But it is.

As mentioned above, the learning curve on this game is also excellent, it leads you along nicely, similar to Portal but at a much faster pace, that still works. You never really feel left behind, however some hard core adventure fans may find this too slow or too easy.

Overall here’s what we got, scale of 1-10

Graphics – 8/10- Good solid colorful graphics, Ghost effects are simple but just plain work and look right, some anime/Japanese flair but not overly done in that style.

Sound – 7/10 not bad but not quite enough variety in the soundtrack. Appropriate sound effects

Gameplay – 9/10 It works 90% of the time exactly as you ask it to, and is very intuitive and easy to figure out.

Replayability – 5/10- this is all down to personal preference, the game offers nothing new, and due to the nature of the plot being surprise heavy, its tough to nail this down. Basically if you can re watch movies like The Game, or sixth sense then you can replay this game.

Learning Curve – 9/10- one of the few games to get this right, although the final end of the curve may not be high enough for some, the gradual climb is perfect for those of us who never could get through Myst.

Fun Factor – 9/10- It just is. The combo of time travel, twisting plot, innovative controls/concept. They all come together in a great package.

Now a brief note on my overall scoring, it will not always be an average of the above because I don’t think its a fair system, just because the sound is bad doesn’t always bring a 9/10 game down to 7 or 8, sometimes its still 9/10 even with bad sound.

Overall 9/10- Fun, great story, good gameplay, total package. If you have any interest in an adventure type game, but have had problems with other entries, try this one out.

That’s all for now, next time I will actually be starting with my first Retro-review. Where I will be going back and reviewing an older game by today’s standards and seeing how it goes. And actually it will be very much related to this game as well, as original as it is, there is a game from the Sega Genesis that definitely has a  few parallels… Till next time!

-Photos used are property of Capcom. They do not belong to GeekTheWorldOnline and are intended for use in character and media review in strictly entertainment and editorial means. Their use is protected by Section 107 under the US copyright law.